Komparatystyczne ujęcie pojęć „wizerunek”, „utrwalanie” i „rozpowszechnianie” w ujęciu art. 23 k.c., art. 81 ust. 1 pr. aut. oraz art. 191a k.k.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

03_Karolina_Witczak - Komparatystyczne ujęcie pojęć wizerunek, utrwalanie” i rozpowszechnianie w ujęciu art 23 kc art 81 ust 1 pr aut oraz art 191a kk.pdf

Size

372.12 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):2eab39f05c694fe8cfcfaf6dabdef1a3

Abstract

The terms „image”, „recording” and „dissemination” are presented in art. 191a of the Criminal Code. However, the source of these phrases derives from civil law, especially art. 23 of Civil Code and art. 81 of Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights. The article author makes a comparison of these terms in view of different legal orders (criminal law order and civil law order). The purpose of such a comparative study is to show differences and similarities in the range of designatums of analyzed terms. Furthermore, this article indicates “the most effective” structure of analyzed expressions on the grounds of law in action.

Description

Citation

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2017, Tom 6, Nr 2, s. 81-108.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Rights and licensing

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess