Konstytucja rocznicowa czy konstytucja wiekopomna?
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
DOI
Files
Loading...
Name
003 KAROL MARIAN POSPIESZALSKI, ZYGMUNT ZIEMBIŃSKI.pdf
Size
209.56 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):2e81e0b76b39f4df090b94c827304598
Abstract
The article addresses the central issue of works conducted at present on the
new Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In particular, it lists arguments
speaking for the acceleration of these works and the adoption of the new Constitution
in time for the 200th Anniversary of the first Constitution in Europe,
the Polish Constitution of 1791, and the arguments speaking for the retention of
Constitutional provisorium resulting from the Constitution of 1952, the retention of
which would make it possible to draft the Constitution in the way that could
reflect a stabilized situation in post-communist Poland and could provide precise
and accurate legal solutions, with good prospects for securing the stability of the
Polish Constitutional order.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 53, 1991, z. 1, s. 19-27
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess