Między „blaskiem duchowej prawdy” a „sprawami państwa współczesnego”. Spór o „czystą poezję” (1938/1939)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk
DOI
Files
Loading...
Name
35 Antoniuk_okladka_amur.jpg
Size
634.15 KB
Format
JPEG
Checksum
(MD5):f49c0ca25321cd32354d827355184c58
Loading...
Name
35 Antoniuk_pdf.pdf
Size
1.46 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):9ea6bb9f02ef3fbff253c39dc95f4405
Abstract
In 1938 two literary manifests appeared in the columns of the press – one by Ludwik Fryde titled: Dwa pokolenia (Two Generations) and the other by Czesław Miłosz: Kłamstwo dzisiejszej „poezji” (The Lie of Today’s ‘Poetry’). The former proposes the thesis that poetry has the right to be autonomous and be free from responsibilities such as presenting reality beyond the text itself, propagating ideas, expressing emotions and thoughts of the artist. The latter, on the contrary, opined that poetry should not look inwards towards its own self; rather it has the task to formulate points of view and demonstrate the author’s personality. Shortly thereafter, either by way of polemic or agreement, more than a dozen literary critics responded to both, mainly of the younger generation. Thus a constellation of critical texts was created, one focused around the motto of ‘unsullied poetry’. This publication therefore presents the above-mentioned discussion by means of a study and an accompanying essay on literary history.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Mateusz Antoniuk, Między „blaskiem duchowej prawdy” a „sprawami państwa współczesnego”. Spór o „czystą poezję” (1938/1939), Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk, Poznań 2023, ISBN 978-83-7654-500-4 (Polemika Krytycznoliteracka w Polsce, pod redakcją Sylwii Panek, tom 35), ss. 318.