Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wydział Filozoficzny UAM

DOI

10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

9-Wesoły2021.pdf

Size

512.59 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):c49ad51a4979ca532120e906d918c1c8

Abstract

The basis of Aristotle’s arguments about truth and falsity is formulated syntactically according to the distinctions of ‘to be’ as the predicative affirmation - composition and, correspondingly, ‘not to be’ as negation – separation. As the nominal defining characteristic of falsity is contradic­tion, so of truth is non-contradiction. The expression of truth or falsity in the declarative sentence of affirmation or negation is a function of thinking as a human cognitive disposition under the semantic figures of categorical predication. In addition, we cite Aristotle’s more important texts on the true intellection of non-composites (indivisibles), the inves­tigation of truth and probability, the diagnosis of falsehood, the truthful­ness and lying. Finally, a mention of modern adaptations of Aristotle’s concept of truth.

Description

Citation

Wesoły, M. A. (2021) “Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa”, Peitho. Examina Antiqua, 12(1), pp. 171–196. doi: 10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By