Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Filozoficzny UAM
DOI
10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9
Files
Loading...
Name
9-Wesoły2021.pdf
Size
512.59 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):c49ad51a4979ca532120e906d918c1c8
Abstract
The basis of Aristotle’s arguments about truth and falsity is formulated syntactically according to the distinctions of ‘to be’ as the predicative affirmation - composition and, correspondingly, ‘not to be’ as negation – separation. As the nominal defining characteristic of falsity is contradiction, so of truth is non-contradiction. The expression of truth or falsity in the declarative sentence of affirmation or negation is a function of thinking as a human cognitive disposition under the semantic figures of categorical predication. In addition, we cite Aristotle’s more important texts on the true intellection of non-composites (indivisibles), the investigation of truth and probability, the diagnosis of falsehood, the truthfulness and lying. Finally, a mention of modern adaptations of Aristotle’s concept of truth.
Description
Citation
Wesoły, M. A. (2021) “Bycie – nie bycie, prawda – fałsz w koncepcji Arystotelesa”, Peitho. Examina Antiqua, 12(1), pp. 171–196. doi: 10.14746/10.14746/pea.2021.1.9.