Pro choice i pro life – rozbieżne dyskursy. Przyczynek do problemu debaty i konstruowania obiektywności
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM w Poznaniu
DOI
Files
Loading...
Name
Ryszard PARADOWSKI Pro choice i pro life – rozbieżne dyskursy. Przyczynek do problemu debaty i konstruowania obiektywności.pdf
Size
71.04 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):7d595cfd8d01a26b64356e84048d9ecd
Abstract
Abortion has been a tool of birth control since time immemorial. The problem of
abortion is as old as time itself. What has always made abortion a problem is the dilemma
a woman faces due to her ability to procreate on the one hand, and the ‘liberation’
of woman from this dilemma – whether by denying her the right to abortion, or by
forcing her to have an abortion – on the other. However significant and dramatic,
a woman’s dilemma is not the subject of the present considerations. The subject refers to selected arguments intended to liberate woman from this dilemma, and the arguments
used to confirm women’s competence with reference to the problem under
discussion. The purpose is to demonstrate the principal differences of these two, arguments,
as well as a narrower argument that might combine the intentions of both parties
of this centuries-old debate.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 2006, nr 1, s. 5-16.
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess