Pro choice i pro life – rozbieżne dyskursy. Przyczynek do problemu debaty i konstruowania obiektywności

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Naukowe WNPiD UAM w Poznaniu

DOI

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Ryszard PARADOWSKI Pro choice i pro life – rozbieżne dyskursy. Przyczynek do problemu debaty i konstruowania obiektywności.pdf

Size

71.04 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):7d595cfd8d01a26b64356e84048d9ecd

Abstract

Abortion has been a tool of birth control since time immemorial. The problem of abortion is as old as time itself. What has always made abortion a problem is the dilemma a woman faces due to her ability to procreate on the one hand, and the ‘liberation’ of woman from this dilemma – whether by denying her the right to abortion, or by forcing her to have an abortion – on the other. However significant and dramatic, a woman’s dilemma is not the subject of the present considerations. The subject refers to selected arguments intended to liberate woman from this dilemma, and the arguments used to confirm women’s competence with reference to the problem under discussion. The purpose is to demonstrate the principal differences of these two, arguments, as well as a narrower argument that might combine the intentions of both parties of this centuries-old debate.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 2006, nr 1, s. 5-16.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Rights and licensing

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess