Znaczenie metafor pojęciowych na przykładzie prawa autorskiego
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM
Files
Loading...
Name
06-Zalewska.pdf
Size
351.98 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):432e0eda2836908cd1806fb0d2f33fb3
Abstract
The problematic gap between legal and social norms exists
in copyright law. The consequences of this gap are severe and
include: not following copyright rules, and a big conflict between
artists and recipients of a culture. In this context, copyright piracy
is prevalent in Poland and legal tools aimed to protect interests
of artists have failed. Copyright law might have been in sync
with analogue era, but not to digital world. Identification of roots
of the discrepancy between social expectations and legally binding
rules might be the first step toward rectifying of situation. This
article demonstrates the conceptual metaphors as a possible reason
for malfunctioning the copyright law. Some metaphors treat
intangible objects as tangible ones (intellectual or artistic work)
and might pose difficulties mentioned above. Additionally, Larsson
defined a group of metaphors in legal system. Bound with them
are metaphors outside of law. For example, if law treats intellectual
property as tangible property, than metaphors outside the
copyright legal system, such as piracy apply. Polish copyright law
in the context of Lakoff – Johnson theory of metaphors is a framework
of the study.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2016, Tom 5, Nr 1, s. 111-128.
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess