Harmonized Alignment in Ethical Leadership: Synthesizing Maimonides’ Rational Allegiance and Dessler’s Giving Paradigm

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wydział Filozoficzny UAM

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

harmonized_alignment_in_ethical_leadership_synthesizing_maimonides_rationa.pdf

Size

555.59 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):7a6250cd540b032d5b63312e31281025

Abstract

This article offers a comparative analysis of leadership paradigms articulated by Maimonides and Rabbi Eliyahu Dessler, emphasizing their enduring relevance to contemporary ethical and organizational leadership. Maimonides’ Dual Allegiance model integrates intellectual rigor, ethical autonomy, and social responsibility into a rational, duty-bound framework. In contrast, Rabbi Dessler’s Giving Paradigm, as presented in Strive for Truth, centers on relational ethics, moral intentionality, and the transformative power of altruistic giving. Despite their differing emphases – cognitive clarity versus emotional insight – both approaches converge in promoting a multidimensional, ethically grounded vision of leadership. This study introduces Harmonized Alignment, a synthesis that balances intellect, empathy, and moral action, grounded in classical Jewish thought. The model offers practical guidance for leaders navigating ethical dilemmas and striving to foster sustainable, value-driven organizational cultures in complex modern environments.

Description

Citation

Hoch, L. (2025). Harmonized Alignment in Ethical Leadership: Synthesizing Maimonides’ Rational Allegiance and Dessler’s Giving Paradigm. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 16(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2025.2.9

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International