Chinese loanwords in the OED

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Adam Mickiewicz University

DOI

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

15_De la Cruz-Cabanillas.pdf

Size

281.05 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):626fc6e6b8789fe7e4008e8aade3f060

Abstract

It was traditionally assumed that Chinese had contributed few borrowings into English until Cannon (1987, 1988, 1990) carried out his research based on different English desk-dictionaries. His studies were supplemented by Moody (1996) who reviewed Cannon’s list focusing on the information provided by the Oxford English dictionary (henceforth OED) and Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language. Nonetheless, Moody’s analysis did not explore all the possibilities the OED offered at the time. This articles aims at revising those previous pieces of work on the topic to find out whether there are significant changes in view of the latest data supplied by the OED, to determine whether there is an increase in the number of items borrowed, which are the transmission and source languages and to see whether any predictions for the near future can be made. Finally, some comments on the transliteration of the terms are also included.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 44 (2008), pp. 253-274

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Rights and licensing

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess