Sankcje Unii Europejskiej wobec Rosji: proces decyzyjny, trwałość i rola państw członkowskich
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Nauk Politycznych i Dziennikarstwa Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Files
Loading...
Name
22-Pospieszna.pdf
Size
453.31 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):59cc5702146d03215701ff9be4359648
Abstract
Celem przedstawionych badań jest analiza procesu decyzyjnego w UE w odniesieniu do
nakładania i rozszerzania sankcji wobec Rosji oraz ocena przyczyny trwałości decyzji i porozumienia
między państwami członkowskimi UE, pomimo odmiennego stanowiska. W szczególności
artykuł analizuje proces decyzyjny, dynamikę oraz zmiany zachodzące w ramach grup
roboczych Rady, takich jak COEST (Grupa Robocza ds. Europy Wschodniej i Azji Środkowej)
dla Ukrainy, Białorusi oraz Rosji. Badania pokazują, że czynniki geopolityczne oraz ekonomiczne
mają bardzo duże znaczenie w tworzeniu dynamiki, jaka zachodziła w grupach doradczych
Rady Europejskiej, niemniej jednak pomimo tych różnic jednomyślność jest w dużej
mierze wynikiem działań Francji i Niemiec.
The aim of the presented research is to analyze the decision-making process in the EU with regard to imposing and extending sanctions against Russia and to assess the cause of the sustainability of decisions and agreements between EU Member States despite their different position towards sanctions. In particular, the article analyzes the decision-making process, dynamics and changes taking place within the Council’s working groups, such as COEST (Working Group on Eastern Europe and Central Asia) for Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. Research shows that geopolitical and economic factors are very important in creating dynamics that takes place in advisory groups of the European Council; nevertheless, despite these differences, unanimity is observed that is largely the result of the actions of France and Germany.
The aim of the presented research is to analyze the decision-making process in the EU with regard to imposing and extending sanctions against Russia and to assess the cause of the sustainability of decisions and agreements between EU Member States despite their different position towards sanctions. In particular, the article analyzes the decision-making process, dynamics and changes taking place within the Council’s working groups, such as COEST (Working Group on Eastern Europe and Central Asia) for Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. Research shows that geopolitical and economic factors are very important in creating dynamics that takes place in advisory groups of the European Council; nevertheless, despite these differences, unanimity is observed that is largely the result of the actions of France and Germany.
Description
Citation
Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, 12/2018, s. 311-321.
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess