Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy, categorical imperative-based ethics and “moral” selfhood?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

07_Ewa_Nowak - Can human and artificial agents share an autonomy categorical imperative-based ethics and moral selfhood.pdf

Size

370.99 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):4b62272f6e56385022ae5c5945d1d6ac

Abstract

AI designers endeavour to improve ‘autonomy’ in artificial intelligent devices, as recent developments show. This chapter firstly argues against attributing metaphysical attitudes to AI and, simultaneously, in favor of improving autonomous AI which has been enabled to respect autonomy in human agents. This seems to be the only responsible way of making further advances in the field of autonomous social AI. Let us examine what is meant by claims such as designing our artificial alter egos and sharing moral selves with artificial humanoid devices as well as providing autonomous AI with an ethical framework modelled upon the core aspects of moral selfhood, e.g., making decisions which are based on autonomous law-giving, in Kantian terms.

Description

Citation

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2017, Tom 6, Nr 2, s. 169-208.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Rights and licensing

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess