A lesson for covidiots: About some contact induced borrowing of American English morphological processes into Dutch
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University
Files
Loading...
Name
SAP 56s1.26 Hamans.pdf
Size
661.65 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):c2cefcaee0270878e4c76b83f6c2b065
Abstract
This paper discusses morphological borrowing from American-English to Dutch. Three processes of non-morphemic word formation are studied: embellished clipping (Afro from African), libfixing (extracting segments from opaque wordforms such -topia from utopia and -(po)calypse from apocalypse) and blending (stagflation < stagnation + inflation). It will be shown that the borrowing of these processes started with borrowing of English lexical material followed by a process of reinterpretation, which subsequently led to the (re-)introduction of the processes in Dutch. Therefore, the traditional distinction between MAT and PAT borrowing turns out to be inadequate. Instead of a clear-cut difference between lexical and morphological borrowing a borrowing cline will be proposed. The respective ends of this cline are MAT and PAT.
Description
Citation
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, vol. 56s1 (2021), pp. 659-691.
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
