Lügenbegriffe und Lügenpraxis in der Moderne

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

03-Dietzsch-niem.pdf

Size

355.08 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):3b1fab347a39c88ce05938dbe4e6e0f3

Abstract

Lies occupy a surprisingly favorable place within our daily life. As the Polish aphorist Stanisław Jerzy Lec once remarked: if you want to see the lie you need to face the obvious truth. With lies, we do not simply stigmatize the dark part or the “backside” of the humankind. To lie, meaning the ability to deceive, with or without words, even to deceive with the truth (for example in statistics), is one of the intellectual modalities of human existence, as well as an expression of misery. This leads to the paradox: One cannot live with lies or, at the same time, live without them. Lies thus reveal their double nature; they attempt to maintain vivid things, just as they generally tend to destroy them. This double nature of lies makes it impossible to condemn them by means of “ethical conviction”, as Max Weber would put it, or with the words of another famous French philosopher of our present time, Vladimir Jankélévitch, who says that consciousness is already provided with an inner disposi-tion to lie, as a litmus test of its noble and mean sides.

Description

Citation

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2018/2019, Tom 7, Nr 2 - Tom 8, Nr 1, s. 38-57

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Rights and licensing

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess