Kontrowersje wokół zbiegu przepisów art. 86 § 2 i 87 k.w.
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
DOI
Files
Loading...
Name
009 ANDRZEJ J. SZWARC.pdf
Size
282.15 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):a944e391d04c0f7329951ecc23b44944
Abstract
Controversies around the concurrence of Art. 86 § 2 and 87 of Petty Offences'
Code (POC) appeared after the modifications of those provisions have been introduced
by the law of May 10, 1985 The doubts were concerned with legal qualification
and the measure of penalty in cases when an offender drives a vehicle after
he has consumed alcohol or some other substances causing similar effects and,
acting carelessly, ne brings about a threat to traffic The author shares an opinion
that in such a case there is a so-called real consurence of offences described in
Art 86 § 2 and 87 § 1 or 2 of POC and that in the above conditions the directives
formulated in Art 9 § 1 of POC should be applied Contrary to different views,
the author is of the opinion that according to those directives, in the event of the
concurrence of Art 86 § 2 and 87 § 1 of POC the main penalty should be meted
out on the basis of Art. 86 § 2 whereas the additional penalty — i.e. the interdiction
to drive vehicles — on the basis of Art. 87 § 3 of POC.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 49, 1987, z. 3, s. 103-114
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess