Rousseau i Tocqueville: przeciwstawne wizje republikańskiego wychowania

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Filozofii UAM

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

28073-Tekst artykułu-59025-1-10-20210429.pdf

Size

315.88 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):d0f442cd82c4725fa3b72cad5bf99c78

Abstract

It is legitimate to speak about two philosophies of education as presented by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The first of the philosophies was elucidated in Emil, or on Education and its aim was to provide principles governing the process of upbringing of the man. Philosophical grounds for the second one were comprised in The Social Contract, however description of the education itself is delivered by Considerations on the Government of Poland. This concept refers to the civic education, education of the political community member. Alexis de Tocqueville depicts vision of education that varies fundamentally from the both grounded in Rousseau’s writing. Tocqueville’s vision stays at odds with the philosophy given in Emil, because it concerns civic aspects of the education. It is also not compliant with the concept stemming from Considerations, due to the fact that it stresses the role of other than state subjects in the education. The article comments on all three concepts of education outlined above and finally relates them to the concept of positive and negative liberty provided by Isaiah Berlin.

Description

Citation

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna, 2020, Tom 9, Nr 1, s. 29-48.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess