Formula vitae honestae Marcina z Bragi i „zaginione” pismo Seneki De quattuor virtutibus

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk

DOI

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Wyszomirski_Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium_XXII_2.pdf

Size

156.4 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):fa80b76afbf6ba60b1ddc5159828e2cc

Abstract

There are obvious similarities between the language of Formula vitae honestae by Martin of Braga and preserved letters of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. However, it cannot be proved, despite numerous speculations, that Formula vitae honestae is a summary or rather an extract of some non-preserved Seneca’s paper. The article emphasises the fact that there are not only language and stylistic similarities between these two writers but also there are similarities in the way of understanding and defining so called cardinal virtues, i.e. prudentia, fortitudo (magnanimitas – by Martin of Braga), temperantia (continentia – by Martin of Braga) and iustitia.

Description

The article “Formula vitae honestae” by Martin of Braga and “lost” Seneca’s paper “De quattuor virtutibus” emphasises that it is impossible to prove, despite numerous speculations, that Formula vitae honestae is the summary or the extract of some non-preserved Seneca’s paper, in particular De quattuor virtutibus which never existed. However, in spite of that, there are numerous language and stylistic similarities, discussed frequently in scientific literature, between Formula vitae honestae by Martin of Braga and preserved letters of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. The article discusses unquestionable similarities in the way of understanding and defining so called cardinal virtues, i.e. prudentia, fortitudo (magnanimitas – by Martin of Braga), temperantia (continentia – by Martin of Braga) and iustitia. They prove the dependence of Formula vitae honestae by Martin of Braga on the thought of Seneca the Younger.

Citation

Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium, 2012, nr XXII/2, s. 95-104

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By