Tryb dochodzenia roszczeń z tytułu kredytów restrukturyzacyjnych w rolnictwie
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
DOI
Files
Loading...
Name
004 BRONISŁAW ZIEMIANIN.pdf
Size
193.53 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):1b1d12245b1395e3d88219ad1fa7d394
Abstract
The first part of the article is devoted to the history of establishing and successive transformations
of the so-called Fund for Restructuring and Clearing of Debts in the Agriculture of Poland,
as well as to its successive disponents.
The main issue touched upon by the Author is the question: who is the creditor for an agricultural
credited by a local bank with financial means of the Fund, and also - whether the bank (in
case of non-performance of this duty by the agriculturer) is authorized to draw his own executory
document with a writ of execution (against the agriculturer-debtor) on the basis of art. 53 p. 2 of
the banking law. The Author presents his considerations upon the above question on a concrete
example. He states in conclusion that art. 53 of the banking law should be derogated because it
breaks cardinal principle of civil law, according to which the parts of legal civil relationship are
equal and all controversies between them are settled by a court. The disposition a the mentioned
could be useful in centrally planned economy, steered rigidly by banks, nevertheless it should not
be further maintained in market economy.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 59, 1997, z. 2, s. 43-48.
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess