Teoria wolnodostępnej własności
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wydział Prawa i Administracji UAM
DOI
Files
Loading...
Name
010 JACEK TITTENBRUN.pdf
Size
258.67 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):836251374dfec570990848793577e5d8
Abstract
The property rights school advances as an argument the pros and cons of various forms of
ownership the thepry of open accès property. According to the theory, a great disadvantage of
common property is that it encourages its owners to exercise their ownership rights in ways that
ignore the effects of their actions on others. However, its argument that a resource will be used
inefficiently if acces is free is deficient since it fails to identify the real underlying cause of the
"common pool" problem, which is not the form of ownership but the indivisibility of the saurce
of supply On the other hand, the argument fails to distinguish between situations in which
a resource is used for personal purposes only and those in which it is used for the purposes of
obtaining income. It is only when the resource is udes for producing goods from which profit can
be extracted that there exists an incentive to over-exploit the resource. From the theoretical point
of view, the property rights theory errs in viewing exclusivity as the necessary feature of private
ownership. For the private ownership to exist, it is sufficient that benefits are privately appropriated.
It follows that the theory of free access property really applies competitive, individual, private
ownership.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 58, 1996, z. 2, s. 123-132
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Rights and licensing
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess