O tym, co ważne w ocenie artykułów, projektów badawczych i wniosków awansowych w naukach społecznych

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Nauka. Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki PAN

DOI

Files

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

O_tym_co_wazne_w_ocenie_artykulow.pdf

Size

225.91 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):7baa46db0658407bda60b371cfa45d1a

Abstract

The peer review of scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, dissertations etc. is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine. Different organizations and journals rely on expert and objective review by knowledgeable researchers to ensure the quality of the research conducted by scientists. Moreover, the recommendations the reviewers make and the advice they give to authors set the scientific standards of the discipline. The review of manuscripts, grant proposals and other documents of this kind raises many ethical issues and problems. The reviewer should be aware of these when deciding whether to accept proposal to prepare a review. This paper describes some of the formal regulations as well as ethical issues that can arise during the review process and discusses their implications.

Description

Citation

NAUKA 2/2014, s.33-65

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By